English version

Hamas and Israel will have difficulty to accept Trump´s plan for Gaza 


The US proposal aims to end the group's influence in the Gaza Strip, replacing it with a transitional entity supported by most Arab countries. During this period, the Israeli army will have to gradually withdraw from the territories occupied over the past two years.

There is a path to peace here, and more importantly, it fosters hope for a two-state solution—Palestinian and Israeli—but that's another issue that needs to be resolved later. The priority is to end the bombings and surgical strikes, as happened on October 7, 2023.

The plan presented by Donald Trump for the future of Gaza is unlikely to be accepted by Hamas. The group that maintains control of the territory would rather fight Israeli forces until the last minute than surrender, and the militants have no intention of living in exile.

It won't be easy to convince the Israelis to accept this plan, even if they recover all the hostages. However, Benjamin Netanyahu is completely dependent on Washington's decisions, for better or worse, regardless of who sits in the White House. The recent attacks on Qatar and the continued presence of troops on the border with Lebanon, two American friends in the region, have already put Tel Aviv's state of grace in jeopardy.

1 comentário:

Burt Likko disse...

From where I sit, Mueller's testimony changes nothing. As matters stand now, each side claims victory on the merits. The only "contradiction" from the Mueller report is its holding back from announcing that Trump did obstruct justice and would have been indicted for it were he not a sitting President. This was imposed upon Mueller by Trump's minion, Attorney General Barr.

Trump personally welcomed and invited Russian interference in the election, and was glad of it. Then he lied about it and instructed people to lie about it for him.

Q: Trump and his campaign welcomed & encouraged Russian interference?
A: Yes.
Q: And then Trump and his campaign lied about it to cover it up?
A: Yes.

I don't see much of a contradiction there. It contradicts Trump's insistence that there was "no collusion," but "collusion" isn't the standard. Soliciting or accepting something of value from a non-U.S. source is the standard.

More important is the efforts of Trump and his minions to cover up the truth, both before and after Trump took office. Firing James Comey was only the most glaring of the many incidents of Trump's direction and control of efforts to prevent and obstruct investigation.

Nevertheless, impeachment was always unlikely to happen, as Pelosi has made it clear that she prefers to see Trump defeated at the ballot box in the 2020 elections. Perhaps she is right -- those who like Trump ignore the evidence that Trump has broken the law and enjoy that he defies expectations for mature behavior from the President; meanwhile, those who dislike Trump do not need to hear the evidence again. Both groups are relatively small compared to the voting population as a whole, which does not follow politics with any real care or attention and tend to vote for their own party regardless of who the candidate is.

Will Trump be re-elected in 2020? That remains to be see. The election is still fifteen months away, and much can happen between then and now. The opening of a war with Iran would be immensely unpopular; the U.S. has been at war since 2001 and is weary of it. The economy has been expanding non-stop since 2009 and it is in the nature of economics that expansions cycle inevitably with recessions. Democrats have reason to hope that Trump will simply lose in 2020. They also have reason to fear that Trump will win, simply because being the incumbent gives him many advantages and he seems to have a core of support based strictly on his cult of personality.

Right now it appears the outcome of the election will come down to five states: Arizona, Florida, Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin. What will make the difference there is a combination of the on-the-ground competency of both parties in the areas of registration and turnout; whether economic trends are improving or declining in late October and early November 2020; and whatever new issues face the U.S. a year from now.

The end result is: it's far too early to tell, and based on what we can know right now, it's too close to call.

Share Button